Are we sleepwalking into a crisis?
The Covid-19 pandemic has brought challenges to every
individual and every institution in British society. Vaccines may signal the
beginning of the end of this most wretched of periods. If and as that happens,
attention will turn to the scorched earth left behind. The extent to which it
has been scorched is only now becoming clear.
Rugby League is not
immune to the same problems as society. In wider society, the less wealthy you
are, the more likely you are to suffer at the hands of Covid-19, other health
problems or socio-economic difficulties that have arisen over the last year.
Rugby League is a less
wealthy sport. It therefore follows that it is more likely to suffer as a result
of the year’s events compared to its wealthier counterparts.
Whilst the most
vulnerable in society are being protected from Covid by inoculation (emphasis
on Covid, a vaccine cannot protect from wider harms), our sport will need a lot
more than a shot in the arm to offer protection.
Whether it is the Super
League clubs at the top of the sport, who are missing the fans in their
stadiums or the amateur clubs who rely on the generosity and altruism of
volunteers at the best of times, we suffer as one.
In the pandemic,
perhaps due the fact that children are statistically the least likely to
become seriously ill with Covid-19, they are the silent victims of the crisis.
Being spared from
serious cases of Covid-19 does not mean that children have been spared from
harm. For example, evidence has already started to emerge that more children
are admitted to hospital relating to mental health issues than physical health
issues. Meanwhile, this article from the BBC paints a
harrowing picture of the impact of Covid-19 policies on the young.
Whilst it was also a
problem before lockdown, levels of physical inactivity amongst children
has increased further. One in three are considered inactive. There has been a
16% drop in children taking part in team sports.
Whilst some will argue
that this is not a top priority considering the many other raging fires, I
would argue that to ignore this would be an example of tunnel vision.
I will explain why. A
recent Public Health England Review showed that for those classed as obese, the
risk of being admitted to Intensive Care with Covid was far higher than those
of lower weight. The risk of death increased by 40% for the obese and 90% for
the morbidly obese. From Covid data, there are patterns, but few correlations,
but this is one.
In 2018, 63% of UK
adults were either overweight or obese, 28% fell into the obese category. Our
nation’s picture of general health is shameful for a country of our wealth and
lags behind our direct comparators. It is not the sole cause, but may be one
factor in why the UK’s death toll from Covid-19 is so devastatingly high.
If there is an
expression synonymous with the pandemic, it would be 'protect the NHS'. We have
been asked to do that in many ways, by adhering to rules that have changed 65
times in total since March 2020. Stay at home. Stay local. Shield. Work from
home. Do not see family. Do not see friends. Wear masks. Maintain a social
distance. These are huge personal sacrifices, which have wreaked havoc
upon our mental health and jobs. And despite a YouGov survey showing the
majority of people blame the public for coronavirus cases, ONS’ statistics show
that there has been 96% compliance with mask-wearing and 95% compliance with
limiting social contacts.
The measures listed
above have all been documented as ways we can reduce the burden on an
over-stretched NHS. However, the simplest way we could all ‘protect the NHS’
would be to lose a few pounds. Despite this, gyms have been closed, community
sport shut down and, at times, limitations on how long and by which methods we
can exercise imposed. This is the tunnel vision I talked about earlier.
You often hear
complaints that ‘children are always on their phones nowadays’ and ‘when I were
a lad, I was never in the house, I was always playing out’. I’ve probably said
both of these things. They were key parts of my childhood and I cannot imagine
how having that taken away, as children of this generation have had, would have
impacted me into adult life.
We may soon be walking
into a post-covid UK and have to pick up the pieces left behind. Our general
picture of health is so poor that the next time a public health emergency
emerges, if we do nothing, the UK will again be left vulnerable,
disproportionately so when considering our resource. We have already
sleepwalked into the Covid-19 crisis. We cannot sleepwalk into the next
crisis.
What does this have to
do with Rugby League? I hear you ask. Well, the answer could be nothing or
everything, depending on your outlook.
Sport England's Sports
Participation Survey shows that there has been a 14% fall in people playing
rugby league since 2016, from 68,400 to 58,800. This recorded fall will only
have increased post-March 2020. Once someone gets out of a habit, it is not
always easy to get back into it.
In fairness, over the
same timeframe, basketball, football, rugby union and hockey have shown
participation falls of between 19% and 25%. Meanwhile, the RFL's most recent
participation survey showed an increase from 102,304 to 109,501 in numbers
partaking in the sport. This is quite a different figure to Sport England,
likely to be attributable to differing methodologies.
The ultimate aim of the
sport (from the RFL’s perspective) is for England to be the best. An
environment of potentially falling participation levels is not conducive to
that.
A national side from
the British Isles has not beaten Australia in a test series since 1972. Almost
50 years ago. It would take a whole new blogpost to examine the factors behind
that, but one is the player base.
In Australia, Rugby
League is a far larger sport. In large swathes of the country it is the sport.
The one that is the first sport that a child will try. The one that gets the
pick of best athletes in the country.
By comparison, in the
UK, football in the sport. Rugby League comes second often in
its heartlands. In large swathes of the country, opportunities to get involved
in the sport are limited. And that is not limited to places off the beaten
track. Wigan has one of the most thriving amateur scenes in the sport. Yet in
the bordering town of Bolton, we have a very limited footprint. We are fishing
in a pond that is comparatively empty compared to our Australian
counterparts.
And that is before you
take into account that the sport lacks appeal (from a participation perspective
at least) to those who do not relish physical combat and do not have the
highest of pain thresholds.
I include myself in
that category. I have been crazy about this sport for as long as I can
remember. But its biggest selling point may also be its biggest barrier.
Brutality. When I see a big shot from the stands, I will join others with a
sharp intake of breath. When I briefly played the game, I did not enjoy being
on the end of it.
When you play the
sport, you realise that every tackle hurts. It is hugely physically demanding.
The scrawny child that I was loved to watch but did not want to play. These are
barriers which are not erected by less-physical sports such as football and
cricket.
And this is not just a
problem for the weak of body. When I was a teenager, I introduced a friend to
the sport. He was a big lad, someone who teachers asked to come along to train
for the school team, because they knew he would be good.
I eventually persuaded
him to attend with me (in the year or so I lasted playing the sport).
Unsurprisingly, he was a devastating ball runner and a brick wall in defence.
He ultimately signed a professional contract for a Super League club and played
a handful of games. He then dropped to a semi-professional level, before
retiring by his mid-20s due a persistent injury.
Time and circumstance
mean that I now rarely see the player in question, especially since March last
year. However, when I did most recently see him, he was struggling with chronic
pain, which now impacts on his ability to do his job. I could not help but
think, had I not introduced him to the sport as a teenager, would he now have a
much higher quality of life, without pain?
Other sports have
alternatives. Football has the five-a-side variety, Cricket has 20 / 20. Rugby
has its own alternative formats too. We have the full contact version. We have
a near non-contact version, tag rugby. We also have the hybrid version, X-League. These are three distinct versions
of the sport with varying levels of contact. This removes a barrier to
participation. It is essential that we do all we can to further to remove
barriers that the sport's nature provides and start to invest and push the
alternative versions of the game.
Hopefully, we will soon
be emerging from our state of perennial crisis into a post-covid world. It
remains to be seen which of the changes to our lives will become permanent,
what aspects will return to normal, or even, if you are an optimist, which
aspects can be improved.
In the post-covid
world, it should be a national priority to tackle some of the problems which
have left the UK so vulnerable to this virus. Such as our lack of exercise and our obesity
crisis, or the separate but equally serious mental health crisis (especially
amongst children). Sport is a force for good that can reduce the impact of
these major problems.
Rugby League must stand ready to act. For its own good and for societal good. We should not be content to consolidate or stand still, but to use our initiative to ensure that we can be at the forefront of a push to get more involved in sport and physical activity in a post-covid world. If we do, Rugby League will benefit and society will too.
A hybrid version of tag rugby that mixes contact and tag. A version that the RFL banned over 10 years ago.....
ReplyDeleteI had no idea about that!
Delete